DVD RvReview: True Grit

It’s the most successful Coen brothers movie in history yet it was totally ignored at the Oscars. What did Ross McG think of True Grit? Find out below…

True Grit (five stars)

If anything it’s surprising that Joel and Ethan Coen had never made a western before True Grit. The landscapes and language of the genre suit the pair’s aesthetic like a comfy pair of spur-heeled boots. Indeed, many of their films are westerns in all but name. Miller’s Crossing, Fargo and No Country For Old Men are all tales that share the brio and brutality of the finest horse operas. Heck, even The Big Lebowski could have have been set on the frontier, dealing as it does with one man’s wandering through the American wilderness. And so it is fitting that the Coens turn to The Dude himself for their eventual venture into the west. Jeff Bridges is one of the few actors who could take a turn made famous by John Wayne, who starred in the 1969 version, and make it his own. His version of whiskey-loving US Marshal Rooster Cogburn is a terrific creation, less swaggering (and coherent) than Wayne’s perhaps, but more endearing for his fallibility. Cogburn soon finds himself matched in the stubborn stakes by 14-year-old Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), who hires him to catch the man who killed her father. Steinfeld plays Mattie like a teenage Calamity Jane and is just as splendid as her more illustrious co-star. Refreshingly faithful to Charles Portis’ novel, the Coen brothers’ True Grit is a thing of wonder: funny, beautiful, violent and touching. Whisper it (particularly when in the company of White Russian-quaffing, bearded vagabonds) but it might be their most entertaining movie yet.

This review first appeared in the Metro newspaper

WHAT DID YOU THINK OF TRUE GRIT?

Advertisements

4 Responses to “DVD RvReview: True Grit”

  1. i didn’t really love this movie, at all. i thought the charm and the funny moments were inconsistent and too rare. Steinfeld was fine but overrated to me. i thought the prinicpal cast was vastly underused (barry pepper, josh brolin), and damon and bridges didn’t shine in their roles. you couldn’t understand what bridges was saying most the time, and i love him usually. damon was better but not consistent.

  2. I agree with Candice because although I have to say that enjoyed myself, I was kind of disappointed because I was expecting something so much better than what I got, especially from The Coens behind the camera. It was just a normal western, nothing new. Good Review though Ross!

  3. I actually felt it was a misstep by the guys, coming after the really dark, personal territory of A Serious Man. Sure, it was handsomely mounted, and Steinfeld was great, but it didn’t really make any real impact on me. Some of the “weirdness” was almost self-parodic, too. It didn’t help that I saw Meek’s Cutoff just after, which for me totally blew it out of the water. Feel compelled to say, in the interests of fairness, each to their own!

    Ash
    http://permanentplastichelmet.com

  4. Not my favorite (The Big Lebowski and No Country for Old Men) have that distinction. But still the best western in a long time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: